Cato and Political Correctness

“Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom; and no such thing as public liberty, without freedom of speech; which is the right of every man, as far as by it, he does not hurt or control the right of another. And this is the only check it ought to suffer, and the only bounds it ought to know. This sacred privilege is to essential to free governments, that the security of property, and the freedom of speech always go together; and in those wretched countries where a man cannot call his tongue his own, he can scarce call any thing else his own. Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation, must begin by subduing the freeness of speech; a terrible to public traitors.”

-Cato the Younger

Political Correctness is defined as “conforming to a belief that language and practices which could offend political sensibilities (as in matters of sex or race) should be eliminated.”

The idea is to protect the populace from hateful slurs and promote a more enlightened mode of speech. The reality is that there is a growing blacklist of words that you can’t say if you want your career to stay in tact. Much like McCarthyism in the 1950s, being perceived as the biggest (current) threat to society was going to get in trouble with just about everyone.

Why is it so important to tiptoe around people’s preferred nomenclature? It is a method of control and elevates protected groups. It was used by the Soviets, to that end, and it appears to be used elsewhere for that purpose as well.

For example, in the United States, it is essentially social suicide to admit that you support our current President, Donald J. Trump. Large parts of the media, celebrities, and the upper echelon of American society denounce him daily because of the way he speaks. His actions are not dissimilar to his predecessor in any meaningful way, but he is still hated by the elites.

You’re a racist bigot if you don’t support the Black Lives Matter movement.  You’re a sexist if you do not identify as a Feminist. You’re a Nazi if you support Trump. It becomes very clear that the P.C. movement is being used to silence critics and political rivals.

Words do not hurt you, it is your reaction to the words that hurt you. I’ve been called hateful things. It is difficult to not to react and keep walking, but that will prove your attacker wrong and that is how you defeat ignorance.

In a free society, discourse is the main pillar holding the whole structure up. Without it, we live in a glorified oligarchy. My mother used to tell me, “If you’re not offended at least once a day, you’re not alive.”

Part of being an adult is being confronted by different ideas, perspectives, and people. Racism, sexism, hate, and evil are a part of being human. We should always fight against evil by educating others. We should have patience with those of us who are ignorant. Silencing ignorance promotes ignorances.

Silencing ignorance promotes ignorance.

Do you agree or disagree with this line of thinking?  Please comment your thoughts.

All are welcome here. Please be respectful, courteous, and patient with your fellow readers.

Comforting Meditations

I am a pretty anxious person. I started studying philosophy trying to find a way to cope with it. Anxiety is not anything new, so every era has some wisdom to share on the subject. Stoicism started to appeal to me early during adolescence.

My interest in Stoicism began when I was reading Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations. It affected me in ways that I couldn’t imagine.

“When you arise in the morning, think of what a precious privilege it is to be alive – to breathe, to think, to enjoy, to love.”

“Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one.”

“Everything that happens happens as it should, and if you observe carefully, you will find this to be so.”

“He who lives in harmony with himself lives in harmony with the universe.”

-Marcus Aurelius

Those are just some of my favorite quotes from the book, and as someone who is usually filled with internal struggles, I find these reminders extremely helpful and comforting.

There a lot of misconceptions about Stoicism promoting “emotionless apathy,” but that is not the case. Stoicism, if I had to distil it down to a sentence, is “Control what you can control, and accept what you can’t.”

It’s not what happens to you, but how you react to it that matters.

My favorite aspect of Stoicism is its practicality.  You can apply the teachings of a Stoic author to your life and you will notice changes. It shares similar qualities to the modern Mindfulness movement and Zen Buddhism.

Stoicism has helped me through some rough periods in my life. I read a lot of articles, watch shows, and hear broadcasts advocating that the true source of people’s unhappiness is some outside force, but that isn’t true. We can choose to be happy, all we need is some encouragement and I think Marcus Aurelius did a great job of encouraging himself so maybe his writings can help encourage you too.

You can read Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations, in full, for free (legally), HERE.

What philosophy has helped you the most throughout your life?  Please comment your thoughts.

All are welcome here. Please be respectful, courteous, and patient with your fellow readers.